To: tacticalogic
"Why would radiometric decay, and only radiometric decay vary with "dynamic time" locally?" That's not what I said.
"You seem to be positing that the energy output can vary independently of the decay rate - that the decay rate can be speeded up or slowed down while the observable energy output remains constant. Hypothetically, you could have free energy - producing energy without any decay at all."
What keeps electrons in orbit around the nucleus? Why don't they radiate energy and spiral down into the nucleus? QM says they don't, period.
104 posted on
06/18/2009 11:20:21 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
“QM says they don’t, period.”
Has quantum mechanics always said that, or has QM changed over time, like decay rates?
106 posted on
06/18/2009 11:23:31 AM PDT by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: GourmetDan
What keeps electrons in orbit around the nucleus? Why don't they radiate energy and spiral down into the nucleus? QM says they don't, period. What says that the energy output of radiometric decay varies while the observed decay rate remains constant?
116 posted on
06/18/2009 11:40:27 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson