Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: domenad
In the military you are taught and told that "sir" and Ma'am" are terms that area readily used and carry with them respect for the person who is being addressed as such.

BB needs an attitude adjustment. The general was perfectly within his rights to refer to her as "ma'am" and if it was me I would have told her to shut up and carry on with your question.

50 posted on 06/18/2009 8:09:01 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: All

Boxer, you are my beeeeeooootttttcccchhhhhh


58 posted on 06/18/2009 8:23:39 AM PDT by rbmillerjr ("We Are All Socialists Now"........not me, not now, not ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: pctech; All

I grew up as a military brat, and spent time in myself.

We were taught to refer to ALL people either older than us or in a position of any authority as “Sir”, “Ma’am”. End of story. Not “Mrs. Wilson”, “Mr. Wilson”, “Claire” or “Ed”. We were allowed to address military personnel by their rank and name as “LT Jones”, etc.

I remember many times when my father would be chewing us out, and when asked if we understood, answering with a simple “yes” was sure to elicit a growling “Yes WHAT?”.

We were allowed to call them “Mom” and “Dad”...:)

When I was in the Navy, I remember being taught to refer to all civilians regardless of rank, station or status as “Sir” or “Ma’am”.

I have continued it to this day, and while some Northeastern women don’t like being called “Ma’am” because it makes them feel ‘old’, I do it anyway. I do it as a sign of default respect for people I don’t know.


99 posted on 06/18/2009 9:54:20 AM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson