Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker

The Danes had offshore windmills for over a decade. Here is the results. Large windmills require a minimin windspeed to just turn. If the wind drops below it, the windmill (i.e power) comes to an instant stop. Functionally that is unacceptable and unsafe for community power. One cannot be in the middle of a critical function and the power just shuts off instantly when the windspeed at the mills drop below acceptable minimum speeds. The solution is to have a utility power plant at standby at all times as instaneous backup power. The cost of burning fuel for the backup power plant more than overshadow the savings from the windmills. It was cheaper and less complicated to power directly from the power plant than using the power plant/windmill combination.


22 posted on 06/17/2009 11:12:54 AM PDT by Fee (Peace, prosperity, jobs and common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Fee
I agree. The idea we can replace coal with solar, wind and biofuel, with no nuclear component, just doesn't square with the facts.
23 posted on 06/17/2009 12:21:27 PM PDT by colorado tanker ("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson