Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

***Congress did not give Czar Feinberg this authority.***

And it would be Constitutional if Congress had?

***These czars were few and far between, and rarely did anything that seriously ruffled any feathers. But President Obama has taken this to an unprecedented level, to the point where these appointments are dangerous to our constitutional regime.***

So it’s okay to be a little unconstitutional, but not a lot unconstitutional. Got it.


26 posted on 06/15/2009 12:59:41 PM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: djsherin
So it’s okay to be a little unconstitutional, but not a lot unconstitutional. Got it.

If something is unconstitutional, but nobody complains about it, its constitutionality or lack thereof is largely moot. When things get so bad that even Democrats start complaining, that's a sign that things might get held in check.

Personally, I would suggest that if Senator Bryd is really serious about his statements, he should request that the House draw up articles of impeachment. I would think that for a Democrat to do such a thing would draw some attention.

57 posted on 06/15/2009 3:51:53 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson