Replies

I didn’t fail to read it, I was simply commenting on your OTHER complaint, the one in the post I replied DIRECTLY to.

Let’s review the chain.

You: Obviously you can excuse the petulant behavior shown by Malkin throughout the playoffs, acting, or at least looking like, a 10 year old kid playing pond rink hockey - grinning like a kid on Christmas when his teams wins, and ready to throw a temper tantrum because he didn’t get a puppy for Christmas when his team loses.

Me: What’s wrong with being happy when your team wins and mad when they lose?

You: Nothing.

Now this exchange has NOTHING AT ALL to do with your previous post. You complain in post 47 EXCLUSIVELY about him acting like a kid at Christmas (sometimes happy sometimes not). There is NOT ONE WORD in that post about him attacking other players after losing (which again there’s no back up of this statement from you, he’s never once been suspended in his 3 season career).

So there’s the simple question: what wrong with acting like a kid at Christmas? Don’t go dodging around with previously made completely unrelated comments. Why not be happy when your team wins and mad when they lose.

And meanwhile, you really should drop all the condescension. You lack the clear ability to express yourself that would give you cause to be annoyed at others for not being able to figure out what you’re saying. And frankly being a condescending jerk while accusing others of being juvenile has is a serious pot and kettle violation.

Me: What’s wrong with being happy when your team wins and mad when they lose? You: Nothing. Now this exchange has NOTHING AT ALL to do with your previous post

You fail, as you have an utter inability for comprehension for your interlocutor. You don't even try.

I am sorry you cannot understand what I've said. You see what someone says not from their point, but only yours.

Goodbye.

Me: What’s wrong with being happy when your team wins and mad when they lose? You: Nothing

I must apologize.

I re-read your post with the "Me" statement above. I thought the "your" meant the fans, not the players, that's why I sad "nothing".
I meant for the fans it's OK be happy when they win and, I'll use the term "unhappy" instead of "mad", if you will allow me, when they lose.
It's also OK for the players to feel that way, too, but not take it out on the opposing team's players!