Skip to comments.
Whitewashing Darwinism's Ongoing Moral Legacy (Holocaust Memorial Museum shooter latest example)
Discovery Institute ^
| June 12, 2009
| David Klinghoffer
Posted on 06/14/2009 5:38:00 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
Well, this is the crux: God did not do what is grand in the superiority of our race over other animals, yet these same folkes do not believe in an original sin, ironically.
Yet the original sin directly implies the sort of bestiality that might have occurred and which have yielded our current conditions of sinful affinity to horrible experiments and masturbate fantasy type “dream behaviors” undertaken by experimentist scientists (eg. Dr. Mengele and other dictators never get to undergo what their “dreams” and ambitions to others impose). Those things indeed, God did not do it, which is the more salient point they always avoid, because they do it and they are the fetishist “fleshists” who swim in such saltless salts of mediocrity.
They fail to comprehend, in their blinding sins and barbarity, that it is the saltiness in the other that is valuable, and they do not have faith that whatever saltlessness lugage there is, it gets either digested or reconditioned. It’s not what comes in that matters in terms of “education”, but what edifying substance that comes out - be it work output as part of a team or personal conclusions to add to the libraries out there.
The missing link searchers conveniently fail to look for the greater picture of a missing solution to a puzzle they obviously do not want to figure since their search is based in a belief in Darwin instead of questioning the whole ethics issue surrounding genocide via abortion and stem cell “research”.
Isn’t it strange they then believe like astrologers that it is birth that matters more than conception time? While it is clear that the NT and science implicate the conception by the Holy Spirit or under certain special and unique conditions as paramount to determining the “future” success or failure or grandness of a being.
The cynical illiteracy, manipulation and hypocrisy of today’s sinful world has lead to such blindness and denial, all the while confering them to confined “disciplined” searches, missing forests for the tree.
41
posted on
06/14/2009 8:21:55 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
To: goodusername
Then Hitler was a Christian in his views?
42
posted on
06/14/2009 9:14:52 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: GodGunsGuts
To: count-your-change
Then Hitler was a Christian in his views? Hitler was an occultist member of the Thule society which used mythology and the occult to basically create their own religion. They believed in a creation story based on twisting of Norse and Germanic mythology.
44
posted on
06/15/2009 7:01:38 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: count-your-change
“Then Hitler was a Christian in his views?”
—He seems to have thought himself as a Christian of some sort, but he had unorthodox ideas to say the least. He seemed to have a high regard for Jesus (claims he was an Aryan - which coming from Hitler was meant to be a compliment, I guess) but had very low regard for Paul. If someone doesn’t consider him Christian, I certainly wouldn’t blame them, and wouldn’t argue against them.
By “Creationist” I simply meant that Hitler believed that species or kinds (as he put it) were created by God essentially as we find them today, and that species have definite limits beyond which they can’t change. He was also rabidly anti-evolution and anti-abiogenesis; the idea of a materialist origins of life enraged him.
To: GodGunsGuts
Pretty lame, even for your standards.
Tie your opponents to Nazis...check.
Tie your opponents to Commies....check.
Tie your opponents to every nutcase with a gun that goes and shoots someone....check.
This isn’t even about “evolution” and he isn’t even an “evolutionist”.....but don’t let that stop your nonsense.
46
posted on
06/15/2009 7:17:23 AM PDT
by
ElectricStrawberry
(27th Infantry Regiment....cut in half during the Clinton years...)
To: GodGunsGuts; All
James von Brunn, the suspect in question, is a white supremacist, a bitter anti-Semite, a Holocaust-denier, a wacked out conspiracy theorist,..
Well at least that much I agree with.
Skimming through von Brunns vile screed, one can easily see that the man was so hateful toward mankind and Jews in particular that he desperately grasps at anything he can to make his case. He interweaves a very warped revisionist history with wacko conspiracy theories to grasp at any straw he can, including TOE to come up with support for his rabid and highly paranoid anti-Semitism.
He writes:
As with ALL LIBERAL ideologies, miscegenation is totally inconsistent with Natural Law: the species are improved through in-breeding, natural selection and mutation. Only the strong survive. Cross-breeding Whites with species lower on the evolutionary scale diminishes the White gene-pool while increasing the number of physiologically, psychologically and behaviorally deprived mongrels.
This is not a defense of classical evolutionary biology but a bastardization and condemnation of it. No credible modern evolutionary biologist believes that human races/ethnic groups are a separate species lower on the evolutionary scales from Whites.
von Brunn further writes:
Marx stated there is no God therefore man is not accountable for his acts to some divine Judge. Man is without soul or free-will therefore without significant individual value. He is an evolutionary animal dependent upon his mind (Reason) for salvation. Marx believed Man's destiny is determined solely by his environment (Marx, apparently, never learned of his nemesis, Gregor Johann Mendel (1822- 1884), after whom Mendelism is named the study of all things Genetic). In nature everything is evolving because everything is determined by its opposite: ergo, the thesis synthesizes with the antithesis thus becoming a new and different thesis this process repeats itself ad infinitum. In society, therefore, conflict (Dialectical Materialism) is inevitable, essential and continuous until the entire structure (State) collapses.
It should be noted that in this case von Brunn on one hand criticizes Marx, who he hates as a Jew and a Communist and Atheist for believing man is an evolutionary animal and on the other references Mendels work on genetics. But Mendel never spoke to eugenics in the manner that von Brunn claims.
von Brunn never mentions Darwin in his manifesto but he does attack Liberals, Jews, Communists, Jews, Marxists, Jews, the Illuminati, Jews, Freemasonry, Jews, Papists, Jews, the Federal Reserve and most of all, Jews.
Vile neo-Nazis like von Brunn like to invoke words like Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest but it is very clear that they know nothing about TOE, genetics, history or science. And neither does David Klinghoffer.
The Left tries to paint von Brunn as a Right Wing extremist; the Right tries to paint him as a Left Wing extremist. Creationists are blaming the Darwinists and a few anti-defamation groups blame it on fundamentalist Christianity; meanwhile the government is blaming home grown hate groups - whatever definition fits at any particular moment but unfortunately like von Brunn that could include anti-tax Tea Bag protesters, military vets and 2nd amendment supporters. Of course someone like von Brunn would not likely be welcomed among any those groups but that doesnt stop the association.
In truth von Brunn is a bit of all of those things and none of those things. He and other neo-Nazis are their own animal and tend to be all over the spectrum of political philosophy and religion and no one in their right mind wants to embrace him as one of their own. The neo-Nazis pick and choose whatever they think bolsters their hatred of anyone who isnt of their pure race ideology and blame a vast conspiracy perpetrated by Jews and Blacks, Communists, Liberals, Papists, etc. for their own personal failures in life.
It should be noted that like his hero Hitler, von Brunn was also a failure as an artist. So perhaps we need to blame art critics and art gallery owners for his actions and the Holocaust as much as we should Darwin.
Better yet, a suggestion for everyone on all sides of the political spectrum; instead of finger pointing and laying blame and making excuses for his actions, we should all condemn his brand of racism and anti-Semitism and anti-American values. Call him for what he is a deeply mentally disturbed, hate filled vile excuse for a human being.
As he is still in critical condition but expected to live, my hope is that he will live long enough to go to trial, be convicted for the murder of the security guard Stephen T. Johns and sentenced for the remaining years of his miserable life to a federal prison and put among the general population, where while being repeatedly butt loved by someone other than of his own pure race; he can really learn something about survival of the fittest.
47
posted on
06/15/2009 7:20:03 AM PDT
by
Caramelgal
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: goodusername
He was also rabidly anti-evolution and anti-abiogenesis; the idea of a materialist origins of life enraged him. Exactly, he had a twisted belief that god(s) created different orders of men, with some orders destine to be gods themselves, and others whose purpose was to serve the others. This was a twisted version of several religions and occult beliefs including twisting of Christianity. Like Stalin, he pretty much had all evolutionary science teaching shut down.
48
posted on
06/15/2009 7:23:08 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: Dog Gone; GodGunsGuts
49
posted on
06/15/2009 7:39:44 AM PDT
by
OldNavyVet
(The essence of evil lies in the irrational.)
To: goodusername
In other words, a hodge-podge of insanity.
50
posted on
06/15/2009 8:05:42 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: mnehring
There was so much garbage, some professed for propaganda, other just general nuttiness. Yeah, their religion of the insane.
51
posted on
06/15/2009 8:13:45 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Darwin was an empiricist. Social Darwinism is a twisted attempt to justify sometimes horrific beliefs. It is not based in science, or Darwinism. You will never debunk evolution by going after Darwin’s character or personality. Try a different approach.
52
posted on
06/15/2009 9:17:38 AM PDT
by
gundog
To: Dog Gone; GodGunsGuts
When you want to make a serious argument, let me know. Serious argument with you.=You are right, everyone else is wrong.
53
posted on
06/15/2009 10:57:47 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: sickoflibs
So Paleontology turned this Muslim into a killer? Well Muslims believe Jews are decedents of apes, draw your own conclusion I guess.
54
posted on
06/15/2009 11:02:06 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: goodusername; GodGunsGuts
What evidence is there of that? He was married to a Christian, had his children go to church, Obama is a Christian too. Go figure.
55
posted on
06/15/2009 11:06:44 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: GodGunsGuts
“Creationists are the definition of sanity”
Wrong!
Per Webster:
sanity 1. the condition of being sane; soundness of mind; mental health 2. soundness of judgment
sane 1. having a normnal, healthy mind; able to make sound, rational judgments
rational 1. of, based on, or derived from reasoning [rational powers] 2. able to reason; reasoning; in posession of one’s reason 3. showing reason; not foolish or silly; sensible [a rational argument]
creationism a. Theol. 1. the doctrine that God creates a new soul for every human being born; opposed to TRADUCIANISM 2. the doctrine that ascribes the origin of matter, species, etc. to acts of creation by God
traducianism 1. the theological doctrine that the soul is inherited from the parents: opposed to creationism.
O.E.D.
56
posted on
06/15/2009 11:08:16 AM PDT
by
OldNavyVet
(The essence of evil lies in the irrational.)
To: goodusername
Hitler believed that through selective breeding that a kind could change somewhat and improve, but that speciation was not possible. I hear that politicians sometimes lie in order to gain favor with the electorate. I don't know for a fact that, that, is true, I leave that to the reader.
57
posted on
06/15/2009 11:12:55 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: ElectricStrawberry
This isnt even about evolution and he isnt even an evolutionist.....but dont let that stop your nonsense. And the Admins will continue to let this kind of crap go on and on and on.
58
posted on
06/15/2009 11:21:27 AM PDT
by
Pistolshot
(The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
To: itsahoot
I’m not just relying on public speeches and his book, but on the stenographers that followed him around during his last days that recorded private convos and such as well. In fact it’s in those notes that he’s even more anti-evolution.
To: OldNavyVet
Well, don’t hold your breath.
60
posted on
06/15/2009 1:14:33 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson