(1) A former NBA star is involved.
(2) The President appears to have tried to bully Walpin into a quick resignation.
(3) The accused Inspector General was investigating a big Obama supporter.
(4) The acting US Attorney is accusing the Inspector General of misconduct.
(5) The accused charitable agency has agreed to pay back $400,000 to the government and made no effort to deny wrongdoing.
(6) No one involved has a clean exit strategy, so there will be a lot of the “he said / she said” dialog that talking heads love to play.
But since this involves Obama, there will be nearly zero coverage.
*******a picture of lawlessness, hyperpartisanship, cronyism and lack of transparency***********
You can say that again:
*****a picture of lawlessness, hyperpartisanship, cronyism and lack of transparency**********
And again:
*******a picture of lawlessness, hyperpartisanship, cronyism and lack of transparency********