Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disrobe or die: Bathrobes blamed in 6 deaths [Made in Pakistan]
KVAL ^ | 06/12/09

Posted on 06/12/2009 2:32:18 PM PDT by freespirited

Six people died after their full-length bathrobes caught fire, prompting the company that sold the robes to recall all 162,000 of the garment and issue this urgent message:

Take off your robe. Stat.

"CPSC and Blair once again urge consumers to stop wearing the garments immediately," the recall notice says.

Blair is offering $50 gift cards to customers who return the robes, sold from January 2003 through March 2009 from about $20 to $40.

Blair has received reports of six deaths due to the robes catching on fire.

Five of the six victims were female, and all five were cooking at the time of the incidents. Three of the victims were in their 80s.

The company wrote a letter to customers, urging them to return the robes.

"If you haven’t yet returned your robe to us, we urge you rethink your decision to keep it," the company wrote in a message to customers. "While we are pleased that you value your robe, we urge you in the strongest possible terms to discontinue using the robe immediately and return it to us."

In April 2009, the company recalled the robes after learning some fail to meet federal flammability requirements and present a risk of serious burns to customers if exposed to flames.

You can call the Blair Recall Hotline toll free at (877) 392-7095 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. EDT Monday through Saturday.

The Women’s Chenille Robes have the following item numbers: 3093111, 3093112, 3093113, 3093114, 3093115, and 3093116. The item number is identified on a label in the garment’s neckline. The robe is a one-piece garment made of plush sculpted chenille, a shaped stand collar, and horizontal chenille front and back yolks and cuffs. The robe has a full-button front with seven matching button closures, long sleeves with self cuffs, a straight bottom with self hem, and two sideseam pockets. The robe’s sewn in label states: “100% Cotton, RN 81700, Made in Pakistan.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bathrobe; pakistan; productrecall
I checked several other articles about this story and found the "made in Pakistan" information excluded.

They must have been over their word limit.

1 posted on 06/12/2009 2:32:19 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Maybe they thought that being made in Pakistan was irrelevant to the story. It seems like almost everything you can buy in a store is manufactured overseas nowadays. So they probably thought that didn’t matter.

I can remember when cheap junk was made in Japan or made in Hong Kong. I remember when the “made in Japan” labels were a joke.


2 posted on 06/12/2009 2:36:30 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Did they catch on fire on their own, or were the wearers stupid enough to wear loose clothing near kitchen flames?


3 posted on 06/12/2009 2:38:39 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I remember years ago when there was a recall of women’s skirts made of rayon that seemed to burst into flames when newar a heat source. I think those were from India.

I find it hard to believe 100% cotton would be that flammable.


4 posted on 06/12/2009 2:39:00 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

well, if obamaFuhrer has his way, all America will be working again. We’ll be the cheap labor!


5 posted on 06/12/2009 2:39:04 PM PDT by fortunate sun (Tell me what books you want to ban and I'll tell you what type of politics you hold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Anyone stupid enough to stick their clothes into fire should be fried they are too stupid to exist.


6 posted on 06/12/2009 2:40:45 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"I remember when the “made in Japan” labels were a joke."

Me too. I remember stamped metal toys that were painted on the outside and still had 'Hormel Ham' can paint on the inside.

7 posted on 06/12/2009 2:40:55 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

“Barack Burned Badly By Blair Bathrobe” Beyond Belief? Unfortunately Yes, but I have HOPE!


8 posted on 06/12/2009 2:47:29 PM PDT by outhousepatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: outhousepatrol

No need to give the trolls more ammunition for their “FReepers are dangerous” “news stories.”


9 posted on 06/12/2009 2:54:01 PM PDT by sthguard (The problem isn't Islamic terrorists; it's terroristic Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Did they catch on fire on their own, or were the wearers stupid enough to wear loose clothing near kitchen flames?

It's not clear from the reporting. My guess is that these women had gas stoves, and their robes caught fire when they got close to the flame.

10 posted on 06/12/2009 3:04:43 PM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Obviously these bathrobes are causing major heath concerns, however lets look at the upside we can place a special increased tax on them similar to tobacco products and reap a windfall at both the Federal and State level.

Hopefully the company also makes a smoking Jacket because we could place a special double secret tax on those products and all be happy.

11 posted on 06/12/2009 3:07:04 PM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It is with such bliss that I remember saying to my beautiful wife, “take off your robe!”

Thanks for the memory!


12 posted on 06/12/2009 3:15:43 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

who cooks wearing a bathrobe? get dressed for heaven’s sake! robes are notorious for loose sleeves which should not be worn near an open flame. i swear, the degree of laziness in this country has reached critical mass.


13 posted on 06/12/2009 3:34:04 PM PDT by madamemayhem (there are only two places in the world: over here and over there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
You just never know what can happen. When I was a kid of four (would have been sometime shortly after Christmas 1962), I happened to come in from outside while Mom was putting some coal on the fire. The wind blew her dress into the fire and it burst into flames, and she got some pretty bad burns.

Probably would not have been so bad but she panics easily (at 82 she still does) and obviously I didn't know what to do. She was running around slapping at the flames and eventually thought about water, and headed for the tub. But the pipes to our remote Eastern KY cabin were frozen and there was no water. So really it burnt until the whole skirt burned out, with maybe some help from the confines of the tub.

Obviously modern flame retardant standards might have been a help in that situation (but I honestly don't know if they apply to anything other than nightwear and kids clothing). Not sure I'd make that a testimony in favor of government regulation on every nanny issue, but I believe there is some legitimate authority especially with regard to imports.

That's not the issue though. I have seen a lot of comfortable and attractive clothing that's made in Pakistan, and I think they are proud of what they make there. And it's a credit to Blair also that they are making a generous offer of replacement, certainly above and beyond what CPSC would require. A lot of so-called "corporate citizens" would not do that. Here it seems they want to protect their reputation for quality and are doing something reasonable and practical to make right a situation without being forced.

Nothing wrong with that.

14 posted on 06/12/2009 3:41:05 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
I find it hard to believe 100% cotton would be that flammable.

Precisely. Something just doesnt add up here. I am wondering if some highly flammable chemical was used when the material was made.

15 posted on 06/12/2009 4:03:36 PM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Precisely. Something just doesnt add up here. I am wondering if some highly flammable chemical was used when the material was made.

Sure sounds like that to me. Cotton burns, but does not ignite particularly readily. Synthetics, on the other hand, can be nasty. And chemical treatments--who knows.

16 posted on 06/12/2009 4:47:53 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: supercat
The manufacture of chenille has been more or less standardized for the last 30 years or so by an international cartel.

Here is something from the Wiki on chenille, describing a way the yarn is made durable:

One of the problems with chenille yarns is that the tufts can work loose and create bare fabric. This was resolved by using a low melt nylon in the core of the yarn and then autoclaving (steaming) the hanks of yarn to set the pile in place.

So there is an additive there, low melt nylon, which can wick to the outer fibers if machine dried at too high a temperature. At the same time, if there is a flame retardant, aggressive washing and drying will eventually render it out.

Flame does not occur until a combustible substance is heated to it's gaseous state. Imagine fluffy cotton tufts permeated with nylon which as a low melt formula, likely be more volatile than normal, and think of how flammable that might be.

17 posted on 06/12/2009 9:13:40 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson