Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shankbear

He never shot the black thug with the gun, he shot the unarmed one in the head which made sense, but then later he came back into the store, got another pistol and then shot the unconscious, unarmed robber 5 times is what the police say.


27 posted on 06/12/2009 12:33:18 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

You always believe what the DA says? Or what the police say?

If I recall, they got it wrong in the Duke lacrosse case.


28 posted on 06/12/2009 12:34:56 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

The unarmed thug was in the wrong place at the wrong time. He depended on the armed thug to do the dirty work and he got what he deserved. Never bring a knife to a gunfight or in this case, never go unarmed to a gunfight. Dead lasts a long time either way.


33 posted on 06/12/2009 12:52:07 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson