Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
I asserted that the word "creationist" as it's commonly used has a certain meaning.

The assertion does not prove the fact.

You have been unable to do the same for any other meaning.

Another assertion. I turned to the quintessential repository of language; the dictionary. That didn’t fit your agenda, so you turned from participant to flag thrower. I don’t recognize your flag. If you can make flat declarations, then so can I.

You can cast this as some great war of dictionaries vs. propaganda if you want . . .

No, it’s actually a rather sordid tale of your murder of the language.

311 posted on 06/16/2009 5:57:36 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: YHAOS; tpanther; allmendream; Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

So the solution to this is for the evos to publish their own dictionary and get it regarded as an authoritative, unbiased source which they can refer to as the need arises.

Sort of a wikidictionary.

They can start with coyoteman’s List-O-Definitions from posts in his posting history. Or, no doubt, from Darwin Central, which in all likelihood has a copy.


312 posted on 06/16/2009 6:07:00 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

To: YHAOS
No, it’s actually a rather sordid tale of your murder of the language.

It'll be easier to take you seriously when you start going after the creationists for murdering the language. Remember, they're using the term the same way I am.

322 posted on 06/16/2009 8:54:43 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson