Oh really? I've read the definition I gave dozens of times here, from dozens of "evos." What are some of the other definitions you've read?
And where's the part about origins, earth age, etc.
You know those aren't part of evolution, so why would you expect them to be part of the definition?
Not to mention how many times have evos actually described adaptation when "defining" evolution?
Adaptation is certainly part of evolution. But the distinction between "adaptation" and "evolution" is an artificial one set up by creationists to give them another line of attack.
And you're serious?
Some I've seen:
Evolution IS God's tool, (in effect evolution itself IS intelligent design).
Evolution is not God's tool since God doesn't exist...it's all just so much random, unplanned, happenstance
Man evolved from apes...
man evolved from ape-like creatures...
man evolved from "common ancetors" of apes...
man evolved from common ancestors of ape-"like" creatures...
evolution addresses origins of species...
evolution does NOT address origins...
You know, it's bad enough the libs have programmed people the way they have when it comes to peer review and so on, but you're actually oblivious to the fact that there's so much failure on the part of these socialists that since they don't bother with actual education that it's NO WONDER there's no consistent definition used by the programmed.
You know those aren't part of evolution, so why would you expect them to be part of the definition?
Oh? And how does one determine that, particularly when:
A. evos DEMAND to make this exactly so...and if these threads aren't evidence of that, I don't know what is!
B. evos get highly defensive and off the rails when someone else addresses origins.
C. evos demand, as I said earlier, to lump creationism in with origins, earth age, etc. on most of their tirades.More evidence of evo-hypocrisy.
Adaptation is certainly part of evolution. But the distinction between "adaptation" and "evolution" is an artificial one set up by creationists to give them another line of attack.
Source?