No doubt her parents will be so proud when they read this little piece. But possibly she's using a pseudonym; if her actual last name is "Love," that would be too, too ironic.
1 posted on
06/09/2009 5:10:38 PM PDT by
madprof98
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: madprof98
"My parents are conservative Christians who believe abortion is wrong. Growing up, I naturally shared their view. But Ive also wanted to be a doctor since I was 4 years old, and in high school, I began to feel drawn to issues of womens health. In college, I designed my own major to broaden my understanding of womens health by including psychology, sociology and womens studies."
Yet another reason to homeschool. This woman's story is nothing more than the widespread and predictable outcome of having a radical worldview inserted into the head of students once they were bonded to their cohort and instructors. Communist know this and that is why they control the public schools. Thing is, odds are that this woman doesn't even know she's been programed to have the values she thinks she has arrived at on her own.
36 posted on
06/09/2009 5:41:34 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Palin/Bachman 2012: Conservative Viagra)
To: madprof98; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
39 posted on
06/09/2009 5:47:08 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: madprof98
41 posted on
06/09/2009 5:50:49 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: madprof98
Trying to rationalize the killing of innocent yet to be born children from the pro-death crowd, always makes me think of murderers trying to rationalize for the jury the killing of a stranger for his wallet.
42 posted on
06/09/2009 5:56:19 PM PDT by
GloriaJane
(http://www.last.fm/music/Gloria+Jane/_/World+Peace?autostart)
To: madprof98
spraying Emilys body full of hot nails and shrapnel. How is her obvious revulsion at this consistent with being eager to dismember little tykes in utero...
45 posted on
06/09/2009 6:15:28 PM PDT by
InMemoriam
(Bowing to the Saudi king is not an energy policy!)
To: madprof98
Hopefully, she ends up ................
48 posted on
06/09/2009 6:19:42 PM PDT by
bfree
(Obamie the Commie-- FBO)
To: madprof98
When good decent Americans are killed by Muslim terrorists we are told that it is our fault for provoking them. Why isn’t killing innocent children ever considered to be provocative?
51 posted on
06/09/2009 6:24:24 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: madprof98
In college, I designed my own major to broaden my understanding of womens health by including psychology, sociology and womens studies. So she willingly allowed herself to be indoctrinated by the feminists. Too bad she didn't also educate herself on the psychological horrors that women endure AFTER their abortions. She might have ended up with a more balanced view of the issue.
52 posted on
06/09/2009 6:25:37 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: madprof98
Research has shown repeatedly that, as students go through medical education, they tend to become less empathetic, more narcissistic, and less systematic in their ethical decision-making. Something is seriously wrong with our medical schools.
59 posted on
06/09/2009 6:50:08 PM PDT by
bdeaner
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
To: madprof98
They didnt know about or couldnt get the reproductive health care they needed because of barriers put up by their culture, their religion and their parents.Reproductive health care can mean only one thing, i.e., enhancing the health and effectiveness of one's reproductive organs. Abortion and contraception do not achieve this. So they have absolutely nothing to do with reproductive health care. It would be so refreshing if these people would just be honest.
To: madprof98
I know what I’D do with those 20+ weeks - I’d love, rock, sing to, talk to, cuddle and feel a living, breathing child, knowing full well that all I had was those 20 weeks. But those 20 weeks would be shared with a healthy baby! Why would I WANT to shorten that time with my baby if that’s all I had left with them? Does a mother not do all of these things and more when their child is expected to be born healthy? So I’ll never see my child’s face until just before s/he dies, (except they say ultrasound is wicked good nowadays, so maybe I could anyway), I’ll still feel my child move, kick, hiccup, know s/he is sucking their thumb, laughing, doing somersaults, whatever. It’s 20+ weeks I won’t ever have again! Why should I kill him/her in the cruelest way possible when I already grieve that s/he will die anyway?? At least I’ll share 20 more weeks with my precious child and then live my life without the added burden of the trauma of knowing I killed my own child in the cruelest way possible! I’ll grieve either way, but I’ll have God to comfort my grief, as well as 20 weeks I wouldn’t have had otherwise and all the firm assurance that God stands WITH us, as we cradle our dying child, once truly born. Dead is dead. The manner of which is what one is left to deal with the rest of their lives. I’ll take God’s way, thank you very much.
70 posted on
06/14/2009 4:35:29 AM PDT by
Silmethule
(I took you from the ends of the earth, from its farthest corners I called you. Is. 41:9)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson