[Ancesthntr]

Yet if you honestly believe abortion is the murder of helpless children, it's hard to see why using deadly force against those who carry it out is immoral, especially since the government refuses to act.

Nor is it sufficient to note that killing Tiller was against the law. When the law blesses the murder of babies, it is hardly worthy of respect, any more than laws blessing the enslavement of Africans or the gassing of Jews were, and violent resistance against such enactments surely is justified in principle.

I read and understand what was written. But who decides? You, me, McGee? See where this line of reasoning leads - to utter anarchy.

Nope, I don't buy it, and I don't agree. Did Tiller "get what was coming to him?" That's for the Almighty to decide, not any of us - certainly not outside the framework of a carefully structured (if imperfect) judicial system.

[dellbabe68]

Once that door opens (assassination) it's hard to close. The place to defeat abortion is in the courts and legislature, not by murdering people.

[Nuc1]

I read and understand what was written. But who decides? You, me, McGee? See where this line of reasoning leads - to utter anarchy.

In the absence of justice we will driven to this point. The reason the left attacked our justice system is to pit us at each others throats. Absent correction they will be successful. At the present I see no correction.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

excellant post...we don’t want anarchy and vigilante justice.