Right on.
bttt
bump
I LOVE Rush Limbaugh!
Limbaugh: "He inherited the responsibility to continue the philosophy and the tradition of a country founded on Judeo-Christian morals, ethics, and principles."
Obama doesn't believe they are exceptional. He doesn't believe in Christian exceptionalism or that there is anything exceptional about Western Christian civilization. He has denied this both in his Cairo and Notre Dame speeches. He thinks that socialism, modern liberalism, moral relativism, multiculturalism, and a kind of anti-Western, anti-colonialist United Nations ideology which always requires criticizing America and apologizing are the way to go. He does not identify with the U.S., Christianity, or Western civilization culturally, nor, apparently, does he consider them worth defending and promoting.
bttt
Obama is like the infamous Rich Kotite. The worst NFL coach of all time. Always made a bad situation worse. Anything he touched bombed. Everything he planned failed. But always blamed everybody else.
Rush is always highlighting the positive and talking up the greatness of our nation while the second hussein is constantly talking down and denigrating the same.
He made it clear that he sees the Constitution as an obstacle to ushering in the change he wants. He and his wife have said that this nation’s history and traditions must change.
They’ve made no bones about being down on America.
He is an apologist when he is abroad and a critic of conservativism when he is at home.
This is not news. The lap dog media has been down on America since 1968 too. Again, this is not news.
Welcome to America 2.0.
Outstanding. I’m sick and tired of the excuses Obama makes. Rush nails it.
I beg to differ:
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you will join with me as we try to change it."
Barack Obama, aka, Barry Soetoro
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.
baraq HUSSEIN obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham
bump
bump