[EDINVA]

“Solicitor General Kagan argued that the Supreme Court didn’t have authority to rule on this case.”

Why do I think it’s not wise for a new Solicitor General (who is so inexperienced before the courts that she had to send a subordinate to argue the govt’s last case) to tell SCOTUS what they do and do not have authority to rule on ?

[Deo volente]

Why do I think it’s not wise for a new Solicitor General (who is so inexperienced before the courts that she had to send a subordinate to argue the govt’s last case) to tell SCOTUS what they do and do not have authority to rule on ?

I really believe these people are so arrogant and drunk with power that they think anyone in their path will just meekly roll over and do their bidding.

This bunch of upstarts from Chicago are finding out it's not that easy to jerk around with the Supreme Court and 200 years of precedent.

[hoosiermama]

Solicitor General Kagan argued that the Supreme Court didn’t have authority to rule on this case.”

Why do I think it’s not wise for a new Solicitor General (who is so inexperienced before the courts that she had to send a subordinate to argue the govt’s last case) to tell SCOTUS what they do and do not have authority to rule on ?

Another case of amateurs at the helm.....With an apologize to Texans....bHo is gonna learn real soon

Don't mess with HOOSIERS!
Woo HOOOOsiers!

[Houghton M.]

Cuz her handlers told her to do it. She doesn’t have the faintest idea whether SCOTUS has or does not have jurisdiction. She just does what Rahmbo and Axlerod tell her to do. Why do you think they chose someone so inexperienced if not to be able to pull her strings like a marionnette?