Transparency indeed.
Well at least they are transparent about what they have deep-sixed! Whoever designed the website has a devious grudge against Obama.
I bookmarked the Government Open Dialogue website for further reading when I have more time. But at first glance, after reading lots of posts on the birth certificate issue, it seemed to me that many of the topics are not the proper role of the federal government, period.
Perhaps there is an ongoing role for Freepers in adding conservative (reduction of government, phasing out of departments, etc.) ideas on that site.
The other thing I noticed is that they say on their home page that they will remove obscene, inappropriate posts, posts that reveal confidential data, and “duplicative” posts. I wonder if the first edition of the home page included the criterion “duplicative.” Because that could be a justification for reducing the number of posts for a certain (unwelcome) position. Such as Obama revealing all the records he is spending so much money to conceal. The moderators could just say the posts all expressed the same idea, they were duplicative. Then it would be hard to know the quantity published on a given position.
Just a thought.