Posted on 06/05/2009 1:41:32 PM PDT by seanmerc
ROTFL!!
STE=Q
Serious query here...This piece shows clearly that she’s a highly opinionated columnist. So how does she still remain a member of the WH press corps, and get to ask questions at the daily WH presser. Her credentials should be revoked.
This is just an ugly, ugly female. What a tragic way to have to go through life.
ARRRRGGHHHHHHHHHH...
GRAPHIC IMAGE WARNING INSUFFIENT. BARF ALERT FULLY JUSTIFIED.
Her credentials should be revoked torn up and burned.
There, fixed. ;-)
This is a rhetorical question, right?
She is a liberal goddess of the far left. It is the only reason she has ever been allowed in the WH pres corps.
Nope. You can't get that ugly in just a million years. She had to have been ugly from birth.
Think of it this way—Gibbs and Bam-Bam get to look at that all the time!
She ain’t going away, gets worse every day and will prolly outlive more oaks.
Simplistic pap.
I want Helen to show me the studies that show growing up poor "obviously" makes you a better judge. Why? The poor are inherently blessed by what? Their lack of worldly experience? Their subpar educational opportunities? Their generally poorer nutrition? Their lack of financially successful role models? Their limited travel opportunities? Non-exposure to the finer arts?
I want Helen to tell me what specifically it is about growing up poor that would make one a better judge. She says it's "obvious" but that just because dumbass liberals tell each other things like this in their intellectual circle jerks, and nobody ever asks them to explain what the hell they are talking about.
Just grabbed my throat and fell down.Please don't do this any more--even inquiring minds don't want to know.
vaudine
tu rn in g blue eye s fogg in g o ver...can’t l as t mu ch l ooong er.
OMG! WTF did you have to do that for!
While I do appreciate the warning label, perhaps someone should post pics of Palin or Megyn Kelly to help the men recover.
It is date night, after all.
“That would apparently appease some of her right-wing critics, who are grasping at straws in their campaign to try to derail the Hispanic woman’s nomination — or, at least, try to rough her up a bit.”
How would she like it if I said libs were “grasping at straws” when they opposed David Duke because he was a Klansman? After all, it’s not as if Duke strung up anybody. Or that he advocated a return to segregation. It was all about the racism in his heart, right?
I like to think of it as a public service. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.