What I was responding to, Ted, and what you've cleverly omitted from your response was you wouldn't find them swimming or
wading into deep water. Why an animal would wade into what you've now specified, water one to three hundred feet deep is something of a mystery. But then why I would expect someone who can't understand why there are no feral chickens to suddenly start posting rational questions about animal behavior in nature (even under a new, post-banning name -- by the way, how many times
have you been banned, Ted?), is my own failing.
Can you name another animal that might do what you proposed -- wade into water one to three hundred feet deep?
Even Splifford the ascii bat in his most beknighted moments wouldn't ask a question that silly.