That is an extremely simplistic and naive - as well as false - interpretation of the meaning of the word "romantic." The bare-bones etymology is obviously derived from "Roman," but the meaning of "Romanticism" couldn't be farther from that.
Some consider the Romans modern, some consider them ancient. It all depends on your perspective of history and time.
Get real! ALL academics (with the exception of paleontologists) are in agreement that the Romans did not belong to the "Modern Era." Stop relativizing!
When I speak of convenience in a derogatory manner I speak of the ease with which people step into and out of marriage
Sorry, but the expression "marriage of convenience" already had a set meaning (having nothing to do with easy dissolution) before you co-opted it.
Regards,
Get upset much?
The etymological root of the term romantic comes from a sociological connection to the Roman myths of heroism and theology. There is a strong sociological connection. That is neither simplistic nor naive nor false. In the modern era we equate it most closely with the cupid theory of love being something beyond man’s control.
I didn’t speak of the common phrase ‘marriage of convenience’ - at all. In fact I believe you were the first one to use the term ‘convenience’. Stop twisting my words.
My primary point remains firm - and aside from all the other arguments offered - you haven’t addressed it that I can see. Allow me to reiterate...
The modern notion that marriage is a temporary connection to be entered into and exited from as easily as one might cross a street is destroying our culture from the inside out. Families are the core of the societal structure and one need only look around to see both, families and our society, crumbling before our very eyes.