Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
Moron. All John is saying there is that we don't have an unlimited Right to keep and bear arms to commit any crime we want to with a firearm. We can't rob, rape, and steal just because we have arms.

What we do have is a right to arms for self defense. Hence his cleverly worded "except in private self defense" that you so casually glossed over.

481 posted on 06/05/2009 5:27:31 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
All John is saying there is that we don't have an unlimited Right to keep and bear arms to commit any crime we want to with a firearm. We can't rob, rape, and steal just because we have arms.

The law isn't limited to robbery, rape and theft. People couldn't carry arms within the town limits, if that was the law there. Or carry concealed arms, if that was the law. Or discharge arms within town limits, if that was the law. Slaves could not bear arms, if that was the state or local law.

The exercise of police powers to regulate the ownership and use of firearms belonged to the states and their municipalities, as opposed to your dream of centralized government and rule from the federal bench.

Unlike you, the Founding Fathers were not dogmatic simpletons.

491 posted on 06/05/2009 7:51:17 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson