[xzins]

the need to gather a group to "defeat" one person.

Entirely wrong on a couple of levels. If you'll check our membership dates we've been on FR a long, long, time, and we're friends. Mostly we know which friends will be interested in the same discussion and bring light on it. For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

The other thing is that we're not interested in "defeating." Our aim is "conversion." :>)

[wagglebee]

For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

It depends on my mood.

[humblegunner]

The other thing is that we're not interested in "defeating." Our aim is "conversion." :>)

I'd really rather not be Catholic, thanks! ;-)

For example, you might find p-marlowe a bit more radical than wagglebee.

I thought P-Marlowe was a lawyer? They are even worse than Catholics! ;-)

Anyway, peace and ceasefire has been established.

Except for certain harridans who wish me burned at the stake.

But I've dealt with that before, no worries.