[Fichori]

“Well how do you define micro?” [excerpt]

Variation and/or adaptation constrained to within any given kind. (IOW, what we can test and observe around us)

Although it would probably be more accurate to say, variation or adaptation, than microevolution. (evolutionists like their word and I don't really feel like trying to steal it from them right now)

“Accepting microevolution and not accepting macroevolution is like saying I believe in atoms but I do not believe in protons.” [excerpt]

I find the objective evidence supporting upwards micro/macro-evolution (as defined by Evolutionists) completely lacking. (ie, I reject both)

“And where in the 14 points does it state the evolution must be upward?” [excerpt]

Uh, if evolution is not an upwards process, then [because of genetic entropy] its called devolution and the result is most likely extinction.

In other words, you end up with, at best, what you started out with. (ie, soup)


For pond scum to turn into democrats, you need an upward process. (Ok, maybe not, but for primates you do)

[Ira_Louvin]

There you go with the “soup” misconception…

So what do find lacking in the evidence?

All that evolution states is that the change somehow gives the organism a reproductive advantage. That change does not necessarily have to be upwards.

Well it is time for bed.

I would like to thank you for being courteous, and respectful

It has been a pleasure; I am positive that we will pick again where we left off

P.S. The Democrat / pond scum was pretty funny!