Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joejm65; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
I think this ‘is she pro-life’ stuff is nothing more than a political stunt created by Dims to quell any possible Republican rebellion against her. There’s no way The Zero would appoint a pro-life justice. This issue is a fake, a diversion.

She came out, she affirmed that there should not be US funds for international abortions.

I dunno...

14 posted on 06/02/2009 7:56:10 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea Totaler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

Agreeing that the U.S. shouldn’t fund abortions in Mexico doesn’t make her pro-life. It means she ruled on one case involving abortion. She was nominated for her empathy and her life story, and part of her life story involves growing up in the Bronx and probably watching a lot of young minority girls getting pregnant. Since the president feels that a child can be a burden, I have no doubt that he’d nominate someone who shared the same view.


17 posted on 06/02/2009 8:32:06 PM PDT by joejm65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather; joejm65; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
WOULD A PRESIDENT WHO BELIEVES THIS APPOINT A PRO-LIFER TO THE USSC?

What Obama Believes re Aborted Babies Born Alive
FR POSTED http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2253212/posts?page=6

In February 2004, US Senate candidate Barack Obama's wife, Michelle, sent a fund-raising letter with the "alarming news" that "right-wing politicians" had passed a law (prohibiting doctors from stabbing half-born babies in the neck with scissors, suctioning out their brains and crushing their skulls).

Michelle Obama called partial-birth abortion "a legitimate medical procedure. " She urged supporters to pay $150 to attend a fund-raising luncheon for her husband, who she promised would fight against "cynical ploy[s]" to stop it.

BACKGROUND Legislation was presented on the federal level and in various states called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. It stated all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted. BAIPA sailed through the U.S. Senate by unanimous vote.

Even Sens. Clinton, Kennedy and Kerry agreed a mother's right to "choose" stopped at her baby's delivery. The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme. President Bush signed BAIPA into law in 2002.

But in Illinois, the state version of BAIPA repeatedly failed, thanks in large part to then-state Sen. Barack Obama. Obama worried aloud that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights.

In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics.

BAIPA passed in 2005.........after Obama left.

23 posted on 06/03/2009 5:08:52 AM PDT by Liz (When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson