Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler
Any crash caused by those factors cannot count as black marks against the safety of an aircraft model.

True, but I would expect those issues to be more-or-less equal among different models and manufacturers. A country with crappy aircraft maintenance won't keep their A320s pristine while ignoring their 737s.

I think the fatality rate is still a meaningful indicator because other variables would tend to balance out across the spectrum.

151 posted on 06/02/2009 2:10:26 PM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: TChris
A country with crappy aircraft maintenance won't keep their A320s pristine while ignoring their 737s

But a carrier would.

152 posted on 06/02/2009 2:11:55 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The University of Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: TChris
I think the fatality rate is still a meaningful indicator because other variables would tend to balance out across the spectrum.

That's pure speculation. With so few deaths per so many miles for both manufacturers, anything other than death rate per miles flown caused by design flaw (whose recommended fix wasn't ignored) is not usable data.

And that goes both ways. If stats make Boeing look bad, those stats better be meaningful, not a bunch of incidents thrown together like gumbo.

154 posted on 06/02/2009 2:26:44 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The University of Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson