Cynicism of pro-gun lobby obscene

Capital Times ^ | 6/01/2009 | Dave Zweifel

[SJackson]

The events of yesterday and today seem to point to the necessity of concealed carry. And no, I wouldn't have a problem if someone had put a bullet in Tiller's murderer, before or after. Perhaps uniformed military should carry sidearms at all times, we're about to become Israel.

[Domandred]

Oh and the part where a judge said we can’t have guns in National Parks without doing an “environmental impact study” isn’t obscene?

At least the GOP actually put it into a LAW instead of some appointee making their own law from the bench.

[ChicagahAl]

"this isn't the way democracy ought to work."

Yeah, RIGHT!

This is the kind of tactic, that the Dems use all the time.

So, apparently, democracy is only supposed to work like this, when they do it.

[longtermmemmory]

The man was shot in a church, many states have “no carry” laws with regards to churches or allow churches to self declare “no carry”.

The murder in the church was wrong but the law would have most likely protected the shooter.

An armed society is a polite society.

[SuperLuminal]

BARFORAMA!

[DuncanWaring]

What kind of parliamentary system allows two completely unrelated matters to be joined?

The kind of parliamentary system that the Dems have been reveling in for decades.

[SJackson]

The murder in the church was wrong but the law would have most likely protected the shooter.

IMO that's a bad law, though individual institutions should have that option. A pass on prosecution would certainly be given to someone saving a prominent abortionists life, maybe a medal. In other circumstances, I wouldn't count on it, but a response is better than being the second victim.

[mad_as_he$$]

Please the Dems have done the same and WAAAYY worse over the years. I was actually happy to see it shoved up their butts.

[SJackson]

BARFORAMA!

No, progressives.

[SJackson]

Yes, it’s the system, which dems have used extensively. But it’s their system, because it’s their country. Obama won the election, after all.

[umgud]

Geez, I’m having a hard time reading between the lines here. I wonder if this author is pro or anti-gun?

[SkyPilot]

Understandably, many politicians wondered what in the world was the public interest in allowing weapons in the parks.

What a crock. People are mugged, robbed, raped, and murdered in parks all the time - both local and national.

Self defense is a God given right.

[SJackson]

He’s anti.

[umgud]

I was being a bit sarcastic.

[SJackson]

If you’d like to be on or off this Upper Midwest/outdoors/rural list please FR mail me. And ping me is you see articles of interest.

Maybe a little off topic, but of regional interest.

[xcamel]

Seems Dave was playing with his Zweifel while writing this drivel.

[Hot Tabasco]

The cynicism is nothing short of obscene.

And all the crap that was added to the Porkulus Bill wasn't obscene?.........LOL!

[metesky]

My thoughts also.

[Billthedrill]

Methinks the laddie doth protest too much.

If this is the first time our author has encountered this very common practice he really needs to get out more.

[SJackson]

And all the crap that was added to the Porkulus Bill wasn't obscene?.........LOL!

That was stimulus.