You do realise that creation/evolution is irrelevant to pretty much all science? Genetics does not rely upon evolution. Genetics, for example, relies upon genetics, upon principles which operate completely outside of how anyone chooses to interpret the data.
Doctors tell you to finish your antibiotic medicine because they are informed by evolutionary biology that bacteria or virus can EVOLVE resistance and are more likely to if you cut the dose while it is still alive.
Industrial enzymes are created by an evolutionary process whereby useful properties are selected for among randomly generated variation.
Evolutionary biology informs drug discovery in terms of what animal models are used, and what molecular targets are chosen.
Understanding the genome of an animal without regard to evolutionary theory is like trying to understand the geopolitical situation with absolutely no knowledge of history.
Many useful non-genetic sequences of DNA were discovered ONLY because of evolutionary comparisons that showed they were highly evolutionarily conserved between species.
I don't know what kind of science YOU do, but the science I do is informed by evolutionary theory.
Moreover, evolutionary theory has “enriched our understanding of life and being and such” to quote Pope Benedict XVI; and has DIRECT SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS as well as TESTABLE IMPLICATIONS, all of which tests confirmed the predictions of the theory.
Compared to that Creationism has not enriched anyone’s understanding in the same way, and has no scientific applications.