Yeah...a “real” journal.
A lot of the other nonsense GGG posts is ALSO from “real” on-line journals that are “peer” reviewed too.
As hard a process as I’ve had getting published in real research journals....I doubt plosonline us very “peer” reviewed and I bet Danny’s research has too small of an “N” to make the grade.
It’s only nonsense to those who have sacrificed their brains to the Temple of Darwinistic Materialism. Indeed, everything is ultimately meaningless to Darwinian materialists when you get right down to it.
Okay, let's take look at some of the other non-peer reviewed, obviously unscientific drivel that PLoSOne has published, shall we?
Complete Primate Skeleton from the Middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and Paleobiology
Let's note that several of the authors of this particular paper have been published in other, obviously drivelous, non-peer reviewed journals like Nature, the Journal of Palaeontology, the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, les Annales de Paléontologie, and die Paläontologische Zeitschrift. Obviously these guys are just pikers who are totally unrespected in their fields of study.
But hey, this journal takes the standard line on evolution, so maybe you're right - maybe it IS unscientific. Nevertheless, other recent articles in this completely unscientific piece of electronic toilet paper include,
NKX2-5 Regulates the Expression of β-Catenin and GATA4 in Ventricular Myocytes
And one of my personal favourites,
Sorry ES, but I think the only relevant "N" here applies to you, as in "N"eeds to know what he's talking about before he types.