Interesting, is it not, how the evos have again changed the topic of the thread to take the focus off their exposed deficiencies, shall we say.
So, in keeping with the original topic of the thread, here again are some links to other threads and articles which address this allegedly inaccurate report of fraud in science....
Studies examine withholding of scientific data among researchers, trainees
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565120/posts
It May Look Authentic; Here’s How to Tell It Isn’t
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563746/posts
Most scientific papers are probably wrong
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1473528/posts
Most Science Studies Appear to Be Tainted By Sloppy Analysis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1896333/posts
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124&ct=1
LOL! All good finds, Metmom. It would appear that Allmendream can’t handle certain truths about either science or Christianity. That’s what happens when you try to serve masters. Although, I would say his science master definitely has the stronger hold on him because he has no problem denouncing those who believe in a straightforward reading of the Bible, but heaven forbid if anyone doubts Darwood’s materialist creation myth about the unobservable, unrepeatable past!