Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change; editor-surveyor
For your statement to be true there could not be anyone who is HIV positive that does not go on to AIDS. Is that the case 100% of the time or are there some HIV ‘carriers’ that never develop AIDS?

The other issue, is that if someone who is HIV negative, develops the kind of opportunistic infections that HIV patients get, they are not considered to have AIDS because they are not HIV positive.

Nice little Catch 22, isn't it?

106 posted on 06/02/2009 10:34:41 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

Yes it is. But therein is one of the problems, trying to define what is AIDS. I know there are official descriptions and the subject is best on its own thread but the silliness of the statement I quoted was just a bit much to let pass.

AIDS long ago ceased being a problem to dealt with and became a football to score points with in that game of Catch 22.


107 posted on 06/02/2009 10:42:36 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

No, it isn’t. Autoimmune disorders have many sources beyond retro viruses. None of them are pretty.


110 posted on 06/02/2009 11:10:01 AM PDT by FormerRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson