Replies

Hello all! I’m new so I’m just jumping in here. Several things (and questions) come to mind in connection with Obama’s statement:

1). It seems very unusual for a prez to be commenting on the murder of a private person (meaning not a politician, not a member of congress, etc.).

2). It is suspicious to me that Obama mentions the motive of the anti-abortion position in his highly unusual response when absolutely no motive has been established and released by law enforcement. How does Obama know for sure that the killing was related to Tiller’s killing of unborn babies? Why is he commenting on an individual crime?

3). Wasn’t it just about two weeks ago or so that polls indicated that the country is moving toward the pro-life position and that pro-lifers now outnumber pro-abortionists?

I’m not much for tin foil hats, but do these events strike anybody else as questionable?

Tiller the killer is shot (gun grabbers like the impression that leaves) in a church (atheists like the impression that leaves) supposedly for being a late-term abortionist (baby killers like the martyrdom of that), all of which is occurring a couple weeks after it is reported for the very first time in decades that there are now more pro-lifers than pro-abortionists, a condition which the baby killers and the rest of Obama’s hard left goons and thugs are deathly afraid of.

First, welcome to FR.

And yes, I think the timing is quite suspicious. You can be the new whitehouse will use this unfortunate act to the max. Holder’s already calling for increased protection of clinics by federal marshalls. “Never let a crisis go to waste...”