“If we agree with the murderer of Tiller, then we MUST logically also agree with the murder of a murderer’s accomplices.”
Why? Can and will they keep killing without his ‘license’?
"Agreeing" is an irrelevant concept here. It muddies the waters. If I hear that a notorious gansgter has been gunned down, I don't have to "agree" with anything to say "good riddance" and move on. It doesn't mean I want to declare war and go out and exterminate the rest of his gang, or the judge who gave him probation instead of hard time.