Yeah, I would like to hear that one since the ACLU never identifies anything properly when they go to court.
Thank God someone is at it again, since no one here seems concerned about wholesale invasion of privacy. What, a problem with prosecutors walking in and rummaging through the confidential records of bsuinesses in search of illegal activity. Nothing wrong with that. I see no problem whatsoever. Doctors, lawyers, taxpreparers, marriage counselors, private investigators, yeah, that's the ticket. Maybe we should just require that they set up street side stands with all of their records and open them up to anyone who can make up a good excuse why they need to go snooping.
I really cannot believe that I am seeing this position taken on a forum by people who are supposed to believe we have a Constitution and have it for a reason.
It is a sad sad day when the ACLU has a higher standard of civil liberties than does a crowd of clowns here on FR.
And you think this idiot should hold public office??? The definition of a confidential record is one in the possession of the government? All records located on private property are fair game?
How do we get people in public office who can invert logic like that, and where do get a passel of fools around here who just nods at this nonsense and says yeah great thinking - go right ahead while I get some popcorn and cheer.
Sheesh. Since when did conservatives all become crack heads?