Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Winniesboy

Evidence?

Take your pick.
The fact that she and her royals get paid 8.1 million a year by the British government solely by birthright.

Her “cordial dislike” for Maggie Thatcher and foot dragging at allowing her to be given a state funeral when the time comes?

Maggies statement that the Queen would be very comfortable voting as a “social democrat”.

How about the clear *fact* that in 50 years she has never spoken against british socialism even once. But simultaneously we are told that she is such a magnificent leader. You can’t have it both ways. If you are leader, you sure get the blame or credit for a 50 year trend. Especially if you never said a word.

But the royals sure have time to talk about Global Warming. But Maggie Thatcher? She’s a class act if you need a British leader to admire.


92 posted on 05/28/2009 11:14:54 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino
Given that her private views on any of the matters you describe are and always have been unknown, and are attributed to her only by speculation, it's difficult to know whence derives your certainty.

she approves of Socialism, power inherited by bloodline, and a society choked by class structure.

Not easy to see how somebody could 'approve' of all three of those things simultaneously without standing on her head - and she's getting a bit old for that.

110 posted on 05/28/2009 11:48:22 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson