Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2009 8:30:54 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo

Hello? Any Republicans out there? Cheney proved that you CAN go after Obama and WIN. So let’s go....


2 posted on 05/28/2009 8:32:45 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

So it is ok to be racist and sexist as long as you're not a white male?

3 posted on 05/28/2009 8:33:47 AM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar (I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom. You can keep the "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
“I think we can all move past YouTube snippets and half-sentences and actually look at her honest-to-God record,” he said at one point during the questioning.

By all means lets do. The Supreme Court rejected 60% of her opinions. That means her grade is a 40. That's an F.

5 posted on 05/28/2009 8:35:02 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

She is a racist, her words and rulings prove that point. If no one wants to make it, then so be it.

But it changes nothing, she is a racist.


9 posted on 05/28/2009 8:37:54 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

“Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

***************

The only conclusions this woman seems to be capable of reaching are sonsistently wrong.

What a pathetic nominee. So our background determines the application of constitutional law?????

And Gibbs is a joke.


10 posted on 05/28/2009 8:38:15 AM PDT by bereanway (Sarah get your gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

” . . . actually look at her honest-to-God record” (Gibbs)

Does she have a record that is honest to God? Does Gibbs?


12 posted on 05/28/2009 8:43:44 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

The statement is logically indefensible. But, of course, that won’t stop the anointed one and his band of thieves from intimidating anyone who questions his wisdom in selecting this activist pseudo-judge for appointment to the highest court in the land.

The body of her work of which we’ve been apprised clearly describes an activist approach, and a mindset that the Constitution should be interpreted as a living document, subject to the supposed changing times. Neither of those notions supports her appointment, IMO.

It remains to be seen whether the pubbies will find the stones to properly and vociferously challenge this unqualified nominee.


13 posted on 05/28/2009 8:44:27 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
a blog-posting by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who wrote, “Imagine a judicial nominee said, ‘My experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman.’ Wouldn't they have to withdraw?

Newt nails it. A white male who made an analogous statement absolutely would have to withdraw.
15 posted on 05/28/2009 8:46:16 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague Judge Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging," she said

"I abhor less or discount less"? "may and will make a difference"? That is liberal gibberish. Emotions driving actions, fake adherence to principles when there are none, just the whim of the day. Words obviously mean nothing to her so what about the words of the Constitution?

16 posted on 05/28/2009 8:47:26 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

there can never be a universal definition of wise,” she added.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I thought she was a Catholic. Apparently she wasn’t listening in CCD classes.

THAT was dumber than the statement everyone’s talking about.

I mean REALLY dumb, as in unformed conscience dumb; as in a Catholic supporting abortion, euthanasia, universal (limited only to healthy genetics) health care dumb.


17 posted on 05/28/2009 8:48:21 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

where were obama and his ilk when they were shredding justice Thomas? (rhetorical)

notice that they are already trying to frame any detractors of the “wise latina woman” by WARNING THEM OF CRITICISM

funny how if one criticizes based on the “wise latina woman’s” own words, the racism mud is thrown.


18 posted on 05/28/2009 8:48:34 AM PDT by machogirl (not one of Rush's top-ten gal names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
actually look at her honest-to-God record

Uh... that's the problem... we HAVE been looking at her record... and it is lacking...

19 posted on 05/28/2009 8:49:42 AM PDT by John123 (Turn on your teleprompter Obama and read your lips... "No New Taxes!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
Sotomayor said:

"....First, as Professor Martha Minnow has noted, there can never be a universal definition of wise...,”

....I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.”

Well, I'll tell you what, Gordita, where to begin?

1. Who cares what Martha Minnow says, whoever she is?

2. If there isn't a universal definition of "wise", (actually most sane people could agree on one I'm sure)neither is there one of "richness" How dare you dismiss other people experience out of hand? Moreover, I don't concur that many of the illiterate, violent, ignorant, irresponsible people in inner city ghettoes have a "rich" experience that I need in my life. Try "pathetic" or "dysfunctional" Those in the ghettoes and barrios who live a decent life do so because their values are congruent with middle class people--so their similarities to the mainstream, not their "diversity" helps them.

3. So it's a "wise Latina woman" but just a "white male" ?(and no mention of wisdom for him). That terminology is no accident. This narcissistic halfwit can take her "rich" experiences and put 'em where the sun don't shine.

Lastly, just because some past Justice voted against your group doesn't mean they were wrong. You might not like it, but TS.

20 posted on 05/28/2009 8:55:43 AM PDT by Mac from Cleveland (How to make a small fortune in the Obama era--first, start off with a big fortune....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

“I think we can all move past YouTube snippets and half-sentences and actually look at her honest-to-God record,”

We have, it stinks.


21 posted on 05/28/2009 9:06:54 AM PDT by yazoo (Conservatives believe what they see. Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

“Justice O’Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases,” said Sotomayor.”

If wisdom is a deciding factor then Sotonmayor is unqualified.


22 posted on 05/28/2009 9:09:04 AM PDT by yazoo (Conservatives believe what they see. Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

her racism was on the top front page of the wsj yesterday.


23 posted on 05/28/2009 9:09:17 AM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

I’m beginning to think that she can’t even speak Spanish, because no one who does would say “Latina woman”. Spanish nouns and adjectives have genders — “Latina” is feminine, no need to say “woman”.


26 posted on 05/28/2009 9:45:26 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson