Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Junk ( Attention, Mao-Mart Customers! )
National Review ^ | May 28, 2009 | John Derbyshire

Posted on 05/28/2009 5:49:24 AM PDT by kellynla

Is China really a modern country? Can China be a modern country? Paul Midler’s book leaves you wondering.

After studying Chinese at college, Midler lived and worked in mainland China through the 1990s before returning to the U.S.A. to take a business degree. In 2001 he went back to China, setting himself up as a consultant to American importers dealing with Chinese manufacturers. This has given him profound insights into the Chinese way of doing business. In Poorly Made in China he shares those insights. After reading his book, you will find yourself thinking carefully before putting Made in China items into your shopping cart.

Midler identifies the features of China’s production environment that make a joke of all the free-trade slogans. There is, for example, “quality fade.” You cut a deal with a Chinese manufacturer to import beauty lotions in plastic bottles. You give precise specifications for the product and container. The first shipments are fine. Then customers begin to complain that the plastic of the bottles is too thin. You squeeze a bottle, it collapses. It turns out that your manufacturer has quietly adjusted the molds so that less plastic goes into making each bottle. Neither the importer nor his customers has been told of the change.

The reason for this:

Factories did not see an attention to quality as something that would improve their business prospects, but merely as a barrier to increased profitability. Working to achieve higher levels of quality did not make me a friend of the factory, but a pariah.

In this, as in much else, the Chinese are great testers of limits. Just how much “quality fade” can a supplier get away with before the business relationship breaks down? You can be sure they will find out, and stop short a millimeter before the electric fence.

Then there is intellectual-property arbitrage. Under pressure from the advanced nations, the flagrant disregard for intellectual-property rights that was on display in China through the 1980s and 1990s has been brought under some measure of control, but much of it has just gone underground. As Midler writes, “Americans somehow imagined that Chinese factories existed to manufacture merchandise only for the United States, but this was not the view from China at all.”

From the point of view of a Chinese manufacturer, the world is divided into “first” and “second” markets. In the first market — North America, Western Europe, Japan, Australia, and some lesser outposts of legal order — new product designs originate, and the designs are protected by patent, trademark, and copyright laws. By all means go along with that: Get business relationships going with customers in those places. Manufacture according to their designs, observe their laws, give them good deals — even sell to them below cost. Then sell knock-offs of their designs to Latin America and the Middle East, where intellectual-property protection is not so valued. This arbitrage game explains the curious fact that Chinese-made products are often more expensive in the developing world than in the U.S.A. That’s where the profits are made.

The most vexing game to Midler was the one in which Chinese manufacturers relentlessly play off importers against buyers. Everyone is trying to make a profit, of course: the manufacturer from the importer, the importer from the U.S. store chain’s buyers, the store chain from the retail customer. The importer is at the Chinese end of this linkage, negotiating with the Chinese manufacturer, and must bear the brunt of Chinese gamesmanship.

Manufacturers are highly skilled at shifting profit margins from the importers to themselves. If a Chinese factory boss knows any English at all, Midler tells us, it is likely to be the phrase: “Price go up!” Whether the manufacturer’s costs actually have gone up is impossible to ascertain, accounting standards in China being, well, Chinese. Since the importer-buyer deal is fixed under American law, the importer must swallow the manufacturer’s price increases, which happened under Chinese law — which is to say, no law at all.

PAGE But then the importer can switch to another manufacturer, right? Not necessarily:

The health and beauty care industry was one that existed in a tight network. Some manufacturers in the industry were even related to one another. Others shared an educational background. . . . Others shared a kinship that was based in part on membership in the Communist Party. And then some had suppliers in common.

How skillful are Chinese manufacturers at gaming the free-trade system? Think three-card monte. One of Midler’s key import contacts in the U.S.A. is a man he calls Bernie. We learn in Chapter 4 that Bernie belongs to the Syrian-Jewish community, the most capable and exclusive of all the world’s “market-dominant minorities.” (They refer to ordinary Jews like Paul Midler rather dismissively as “jay-dubs,” from the consonants in “Jew.”)

Yet with all his savvy and connections, Bernie is outfoxed time and again by the Chinese. He turns the tables on them just once, in Chapter 21, but his advantage is merely temporary. The worldly and confident Jewish diamond dealer in Chapter 15 fares even worse. This would be a mighty King Kong vs. Godzilla clash of market-dominant minorities, except that the Chinese are on their home turf — actually a majority. Outsiders stand no chance.

With his strong background in Chinese history and culture, Midler is able to identify some of the underlying problems. Many of his vexations echo those voiced by foreigners in China for half a millennium or more: a love of excuse and pretense, the elevation of appearance over substance, admiration for unprincipled cleverness, shame a much stronger sanction than guilt. The old stereotype of the Chinese as chronic gamblers has some foundation in the Chinese psyche, too, as Midler notes:

The impression I got at some of the factories that engaged in quality manipulation schemes is that they did so after growing bored with their more conventional successes. . . . There was a great deal of excitement that came with getting a new business off the ground. These manufacturers were thrilled when they signed up their first major customer, and they got another kick from orders that were especially large. When deal flow leveled out, factory owners looked for other ways in which they could capture that hint of thrill.

All these quirks of national character would be harmlessly amusing in a business environment constrained by impartial law and rational politics, as indeed is the case in Hong Kong and Singapore, and increasingly in Taiwan. In mainland China’s barbarously low level of political and legal development, they express as poisonous pathologies — metaphorically poisonous to a healthy capitalist mentality, but sometimes literally poisonous to the unwary consumer, as we have seen in the recent scandals over toys, baby food, and pet food.

None of this will come right until the current odious dictatorship falls and the Chinese have a system of government worthy of their great talents and civilizational glories. Can we do anything to help? We might have, once. Paul Midler:

During the Clinton administration, when Most Favored Nation status for China was debated in Congress, there was a chance for the United States to hold out for political and economic reform in China, but the opportunity was lost. . . . Improved structural conditions made possible then might have more appropriately set the stage for stability going forward. Instead, American politicians and business leaders rushed headlong into greater levels of interdependency with China, a nation whose reliability is questionable.

Poorly Made in China manages to be both instructive and entertaining, with lessons not only for businesspeople looking to China for profits, but also for our politicians seeking to promote honest trade and U.S. national interests. I wish I could believe that the latter, some of them at least, might pay attention. On past experience, though, that is too much to hope for.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: buymadeinusa; china; chineseculture; commerce; communists; junk; suckers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: ReneeLynn

You pinged me for that, Newbie?

Got a cell? Call somebody who cares. LMAO


61 posted on 05/28/2009 5:21:50 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

How long does a freeper have to be a member before they are no longer a newbie...

Back in the old days, what, 6-12 months??


62 posted on 05/28/2009 5:40:48 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Brilliant response. Newbie. Wow, never heard that one before.

Why don’t you join all those people who won’t use paperbags cause they destroy the forest, or have to shop at all natural grocery stores or watch out for the clothing made in sweatshops!? In other words the PC, anal crowd. Because that’s just what you’re sounding like by going for WalMart.

And if you start the thread, don’t you usually get pinged when people reply to the first post? Wow, I may be a newbie but I’m not that new. I guess it’s just reply only if I agree with you. That would make you kind of a newbie here wouldn’t it?


63 posted on 05/28/2009 5:56:18 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism, it's the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Now and then, we all respond to a specific person, but we’re talking to all in the thread. I feel kinda pushy writing “All” in the “To” box, so I usually don’t; but it was to all I was writing when I recommended the search engine, not to you particularly.
It’s obvious from the quality and quantity of your postings (which I notice daily!) that you, kellynla, do not need my advice about search engines. ;)

That out of the way...my favorite category for buying American is tools. Basic hand tools like hammers, pliers, wrenches; plus scissors and knives. The Chinese stuff is complete crap, but you can get a hundred-year-old American-made hammer on ebay and know that it will outlast you. If it’s an anvil, two or three hundred years old!


64 posted on 05/28/2009 6:05:52 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Confirm thy soul in self-control, thy liberty in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

rhombus: “How is what Chinese manufacturing has done to Amnerican manufacturing much different than what Southern and Western manufacturing did to Northeastern manufacturing?”

You must be out of your mind! I have yet to hear, for example, of toxic wallboard coming from the south or west.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-IMPACT-Chinese-drywall-apf-14904936.html

I’ve never seen a car (even made by the UAW) that had this level of crash test performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHZqcKj7jNM


65 posted on 05/28/2009 6:08:41 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ("Bankruptcy is not a sign of weakness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

dollar stores sell a lot of toothpaste and stuff from China... I think I will stick to ice trays and shower curtains


66 posted on 05/28/2009 6:57:16 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now, NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; Salamander; Markos33
"And just as we are funding the War on Terror on BOTH ENDS every time we fill up at the gas pumps...we borrow money from the Chicoms so that we can continue to buy their products...how dumb are we?"

I have long wondered why our country does not simply impose what I like to call "mirror tariffs." This would be the imposition of restrictions on imports that exactly match whatever the restrictions are in the importing country on our goods and services.

If American produce is left to rot on Japanese docks while passing quarantine, then a commensurate restriction on their goods entering the US is imposed. If the ChiComs want to send dog food into the US without quality controls, then we get to send them all the stuff that the CPSC won't let our manufacturers sell here.

Of course, there are probably a host of AufgeblasenBlutegelBourgeoisirBurokraten in Washington (and maybe even a few FReepers) who would lecture me on why this wouldn't work. It makes too much sense.
67 posted on 05/28/2009 7:14:37 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

A similar thing happened to the company my brother worked for.


68 posted on 05/28/2009 7:17:55 PM PDT by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; All
Puritan Work Ethic:

"The Puritans declared the sanctity of all honorable work. In so doing, they rejected a centuries-old division of callings into “sacred” and “secular”… This Puritan rejection of the dichotomy between sacred and secular work has far-reaching implications. It judges every honorable job to be of intrinsic value, and integrates every vocation with a Christian’s spiritual life. It makes every job consequential by regarding it as the arena for glorifying and obeying God and for expressing love (through service) to a neighbor."

Puritan Work Ethic: the Dignity of Life’s Labors,
Christianity Today, October 1979, p. 15

69 posted on 05/28/2009 7:36:54 PM PDT by donna (Gasoline usage: Demand dropped 9.6% in 2008; total decline from 2005 thru 2008 was 28%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Many things that are made in China don’t HAVE an American-made alternative.

When’s the last time you saw an American-made DVD player, or television?


70 posted on 05/28/2009 8:59:38 PM PDT by RockinRight (How do you like your Savior now, libs? Looks like Jimmy Carter is no longer the worst President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“merchandise made in America”
Where? It’s rarer than hen’s teeth...at least in my neck of the woods.


71 posted on 05/28/2009 11:41:54 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: donna

bump


72 posted on 05/28/2009 11:57:24 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We either Free America ourselves, or it is midnight for humanity for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Ditto.


73 posted on 05/29/2009 2:12:57 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Poor translation on your part.

Our domestic unions with their populist political comrades have created the Chinese opportunity you observe so bitterly today.


74 posted on 05/29/2009 2:15:34 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
How naive. You sound like a Democrat. Think about what you are saying. Is there no domestic reason for our loss of jobs? Do local zoning ordinances (wholly politicized) and state laws make any difference? What happened in the 70s to harm our manufacturing base? Take a look at history and you'll see our own fifth column paved the way. The trouble is not free trade, but strangled liberty at home.
75 posted on 05/29/2009 2:19:37 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

If America-first is a democrat position, then Republicans are on the wrong side.


76 posted on 05/29/2009 2:24:49 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Got Tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
Correct. We drove them off-shore. Obama is not unique, he's one of a long line of destroyers and manipulators.
77 posted on 05/29/2009 2:26:53 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Maybe we are arguing at cross purposes. Can you give me a clarifying definition of America First?


78 posted on 05/29/2009 2:31:08 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright
Great video of that car crash. Who would even engineer something so junky?

Historically, Rhombus is right. There were quality problems and you cannot select their worse against our best to make a forceful argument.

The point being now that we know about Chinese drywall how likely will you be to purchase any? As to that Chinese car?

Choice is fundamental to the free market and liberty in general. That some cheat or abuse the system (going on since the dawn of time) isn't any reason to set up some political regime to manage our lives.

We're supposed to be a free people, able to decide for ourselves how and where we will spend our money. No one likes junk and no one fears the flame like the fool who's badly burned.

79 posted on 05/29/2009 2:38:26 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I think perhaps our difference isn’t so much how we view America, but how we view China.

Throughout American history, we have when necessary faced and overcome foreign rivals which have made the mistake of tangling tangled with America. It has made us confident - and naive.

We seem to have concluded those victories have been a result of our American-ness. That we’re somehow magic. Smarter. More capable. More industrious.

Well when I go into (any) store now - I see we don’t seem to be smarter. Or more capable. Or more industrious.

We seem to have become incredibly foolish, and lazy. Squandering history’s most incredible manufacturing base - for short term gain.

China has a 5000 year history of martial strategic planning, and a population which is young, ambitious, capable and frankly, more than a bit like that of Germany before WWII. Except China is (infinitely) more powerful than was Germany.

China now owns, operates and profits from what used to be the “arsenal of Democracy”. America’s once historic manufacturing base.

We *gave* it to them.

China is now in a position to use that manufacturing base - which was the power of the sleeping giant, which Isoroku Yamamoto once referred to.

However China wishes. Even, if they decide - against us.

And Republicans are all for that??

Then Republicans are on the wrong side. And completely blind to the real issue.

Giving away America’s sovereignty and our real power - our manufacturing and technical abilities and our workforce. To a communist nation 4 times our population.

As long as we are making live difficult for unions.

Yes. I’d say we’re arguing at cross purposes.


80 posted on 05/29/2009 2:47:01 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Got Tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson