I know what you’re saying, but awhile back (maybe a couple years ago) Kristinn went on O’Reilly and tried to defend against a similar complaint by BOR only to be replied to with “well, pay more people to moderate” or something similar. Kristinn tried to explain that it’s impossible to catch every questionable comment and that it costs money to hire more people, etc., to no avail. IMO, if that’s the best BOR can come up with (the diabetes quote), it’s obvious he’s looking for anything to criticize FR with so he can appear “fair and balanced.” FR compared to DU or any number of left-wacko sites is saintly. But, no doubt, now BOR will accuse Jim Robinson of calling him names and “attacking” little ‘ol innocent Bill.
Thanks for the information and perspective.