Interesting. Hopefully it works as advertised. It is cool looking, though.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Reaganesque
That thing is ugly as sin.
56 posted on
05/27/2009 11:25:25 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
To: Reaganesque
Where do you mount the bayonet?
57 posted on
05/27/2009 11:26:31 AM PDT by
ArtyFO
(I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
To: Reaganesque
Clearly, these guys have been playing too much DOOM.
To: Reaganesque
Cute little weapon. Reminds me of the FN model FS2000 I keep seeing at the gunshows for $2500. I wonder how it's going to compare to the old M14 or even better the Garand when it comes to CQB and a needed buttstroke to the skull?
65 posted on
05/27/2009 11:39:38 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: Reaganesque
Looks like a Mobile Infantry rifle from Starship Troopers.
67 posted on
05/27/2009 11:45:24 AM PDT by
Gideon7
To: Reaganesque
69 posted on
05/27/2009 11:47:38 AM PDT by
Gideon7
To: Reaganesque
Yeah... the military will spend billions of dollars on the “new high tech weapon of the future” but when it comes to training with that weapon... the soldiers get screwed. This last month we had soldiers leave Ft. McCoy (for Iraq) who had just barely qualified (after 5-6 attempts). Why? No class on their assigned weapon. Commanders are signing off that their unit is trained when they are not. If you are in a position that you could do something about the atrocity... Freep mail me. The chain of command has failed.
- A Senior Weapons Instructor.
74 posted on
05/27/2009 12:01:30 PM PDT by
jprobst
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Reaganesque
This may sound like a stupid question, but the why the hell is an American Company partnering with a GERMAN firm to manufacture weapons for the AMERICAN military???
Winchester isn’t interested? There are no manufacturers in the U.S. who can produce it??
I smell somebody’s buddy getting a kickback or contract here.
Suppose we get involved in a major war and the supply of weapons from Germany is cut off?
76 posted on
05/27/2009 12:25:34 PM PDT by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: Reaganesque
What they also really need is an infrared laser sight for the M203 or the M79|(which shouldn’t have been decomissioned IMO). The M203 would be much more useful with such a device.
81 posted on
05/27/2009 12:45:19 PM PDT by
RC one
To: Reaganesque
Should be able to shoot around dat tree.
94 posted on
05/27/2009 6:53:21 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: All
Who cares what it costs? If it helps put down even one taxpayer rebellion or un-permitted non-secular church in the future United Socialist States it will be worth it. (sarcasm).
97 posted on
05/27/2009 9:57:42 PM PDT by
LibTeeth
To: Reaganesque
That's a cute rifle but where's the bayonet attach?
The new 50 will never be as pretty as a Ma duece.
104 posted on
05/28/2009 3:54:12 AM PDT by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
