Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TeleStraightShooter
I suppose a case could be made that there is a compelling interest to forbid polygamy under the assumption that up to 15% of the male population would not marry leading to severe social problems.

Roe v. Wade...

Society has no right to intervene in private reproductive choices.

Doesn't a woman have the "right to choose" several husbands???

42 posted on 05/27/2009 3:46:28 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Roe v. Wade...
Society has no right to intervene in private reproductive choices.

Yes, up to a point when the compelling interest kicks in - 28 weeks/ 1st trimester in Roe v. Wade which was superseded by the current standard of whatever science deems viable today, 19 weeks(?) in PP vs Casey.

63 posted on 05/27/2009 1:01:10 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (Barack Benito Obama heads the most shocking "end justifies the means" gang of thugs/ administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson