Her “hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life” when each is acting as a judge “in deciding cases.”
Sure wish they’d hurry up and pass that hate law bill. That really hurt my feelings and she belongs in jail for that.
I’m really confused here. Could someone please explain how “living the life of a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences” makes someone better able to apply the provisions of the U.S. Constitution to reviews of lower-court decisions that have been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court? Brandeis? Cardozo? Hand? Holmes? Anyone?