Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SwinneySwitch
Both the Osborns say they are not against guns but what they call irresponsible gun use.

Okay, who gets to define 'Irresponsible' gun use?

This is not a constitutional issue to them.

Kind of like when someone says “it's not about the money, it's ABOUT the money”

Like it or not, this can be construed as an 2nd amendment issue

10 posted on 05/26/2009 9:47:00 AM PDT by HammerT (Buy them so they CAN'T BAN them!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HammerT
I don't have all the facts on this particular case (neither does anybody else I've seen posting here). So I'll answer this one general question:

Okay, who gets to define 'Irresponsible' gun use?

(Part of) The answer is simple and should be obvious: When your bullets are landing on my property, your gun use is irresponsible.

17 posted on 05/26/2009 9:51:07 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson