Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
No that is what the state court did, their decision was overruled. The man should have been allowed to meet with his attorney before further contact by the police after the court hearing.
6 posted on 05/26/2009 9:28:36 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat
The man should have been allowed to meet with his attorney before further contact by the police after the court hearing.

Was he prevented from doing so or did he just not meet with his attorney? It doesn't state what happened in the summary.

7 posted on 05/26/2009 9:31:11 AM PDT by frogjerk (C-NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

I’m OK with the State court’s holding. He didn’t ask for a lawyer, so he doesn’t get the protection.

I’m not cool, however, with overruling a rule that prohibits interrogation after a suspect has requested a lawyer. I’ll withhold final judgment until I read Edwards.


9 posted on 05/26/2009 9:33:14 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson