All you would need to falsify the obvious conclusion that facilitated variation was designed with a purpose in mind is to identify the material cause for the same. And since Temple of Darwin scientists have no better explanation for faciliated variation—other than the lame idea that facilitated variation appears to be designed with a purpose, but really isn’t (in ways they can’t explain)—intelligent design remains the best explanation for the same.
Again, so it is too complex to understand so that means that God did it, same song different verse.
Your use of big words, and hyperbole still fails to answer the question.
Using evolution as a straw man does not answer the question.
What experiments would falsify your assertion?