[GodGunsGuts]

It's a real journal FreeDumb. That's why it is called Journal of Creation.

Duh!

[PugetSoundSoldier]

And it has poorly written articles; in fact, in the first page of that article, the author uses Yockey to "disprove" the protein-then-RNA-then-DNA sequence of events, and literally in the same paragraph declares Yockey wrong about his conclusions!

Furthermore, the fundamental basis of the article, Kirschner and Gerhart's book The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma actually argues FOR Darwinian evolution, just with a modification and explanation of how the steps occurred!

Look, if you're going to rely on others to make your claim, it's best to actually understand WHAT they state, and then not to disagree with them to prove your own point on relying on them in the first place!

This paper is an extremely twisted set of logic to make a jump from a Darwinian evolutionary approach to somehow being "we don't know all parts of the process thus it must be intelligently designed".

I guess jumping to conclusions after mangling your references is par for the course in the ID world, though...