Posted on 05/25/2009 1:19:35 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
“Yes, but good people aren’t usually willing to fight “dirty” which is what evil does.”
True, and that often appears to put them at a further disadvantage.
“You seem to be pushing peds off on NAMBLA in order to exonerate gays. Or do I miss your drift?”
You do miss my drift. I think your point is, homesexuals are bad and if it is possible to categorize them as child molestors, then even better. You are not looking at statistical evidence in order to understand pedophelia, but as a means of lumping a group (gays) as pedophiles. In order to do this, you label any man who has had sex with an underage boy as a homosexual, even if he has never had sex with an adult male. What statistics do you have that show that homosexuals who have sex with adult males also have sex with male children? Furthermore, how do you count the girls who have been molested by their fathers. The reporting of sexual abuse from a parent is likely to be considerably lower than reports of sexual abuse from a non family member.
My point, in a nutshell is, that I don’t think it is reasonable to call a man homosexual who has no desire to have sex with another adult male. His drive is not for males but for children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.