To: Roccus
Only a few pictures exist of the damage to WTC 7 but it was extensive caused by debris from the fallen twin towers. It looked to me almost like the damage done during the Oklahoma City bombing, only turned upside down.
The 9/11 truthers have achieved one slight “victory.” Their refusal to accept reality and facts have basically made most of us who can debunk their theories give up even trying to set them straight as they're too stupid waste our time with.
29 posted on
05/24/2009 5:01:25 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I also forgot to add that in order to destroy the truthers weak premises, one has to first consider that they could be “right,” just for the sake of argument. That’s where they say ah ha, so it could have been done. They don’t care about the laws of physics or any other facts that get in the way. Just that you even considered their idea is enough for them.
30 posted on
05/24/2009 5:17:35 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
140 West St. (Verizon bldg) was closer to 1 WTC than 7 WTC was and yet it survived. Though 7 WTC recieved some damage from the collapse of 1 WTC, it was the long duration fuel fed fires that led to its collapse. Most (if not all) the video of 7 WTC that day was taken from the north...the side not facing 1 WTC.
33 posted on
05/24/2009 5:32:24 AM PDT by
Roccus
(The Capitol, the White House, the Court House...........America's Axis of Evil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson