I see your point. However I can’t really get behind Liberty U on this one. From what I’ve seen of the world, I’ve come to believe the worst possible form of government is now and always has been a one party system. As a result, I can’t in good conscience support anything that seeks to infringe upon the equal access of multiple parties to individual voters. Not even it benefits my party, and promotes my beliefs because I know that if it continues it will eventually abandon those beliefs.
I agree. But Liberty's action does no such thing.
“As a result, I can’t in good conscience support anything that seeks to infringe upon the equal access of multiple parties to individual voters.”
One more time - this is a private entity that has religious liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly etc. They are not abridging the rights of any of these students by not endorsing a group that is antithetical to the schools mission.
This isn’t about the Democrat Party per se of the GOP it is about the activities of the said group which violates the by laws of the University. A conservative Democrat group would indeed be acceptable where as a log cabin Republican group would not. It is not so hard to understand and I agree with you stand on a one party system. I’m not happy with either one of them in total though the Democrat party is lost to me.
The Supreme Court once made a mistake when it conjured up a vision of school teachers being jack booted thugs ladeling out government policy to first graders.
BTW, not only is Liberty U not a government, it's a private institution.
Seems to me that limiting the evil influence of Democrats on campus would be an acceptable, even desirable activity.