Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Middleton

“Allow me to reiterate: I SUPPORT THE 2ND AMENDMENT...because citizens should be able to own guns for personal protection against criminals. NOT because re-enacting Lexington and Concord is a viable plan for stopping the rise of a totalitarian regime in the United States.

Then you don’t understand the purpose of the 2nd nor have any faith in your fellow American.

I refuse to allow the 2nd to be defined as for duck hunting of for personal defense. It is for the use in throwing off the chains of a tyrannical government.


87 posted on 05/23/2009 4:36:46 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
"Then you don’t understand the purpose of the 2nd"

I understand the purpose. I also understand that it has little chance of working in practice anymore. Honestly, this is at least the third or fourth time I've said this, does everybody have the same reading difficulties as Travis?

"nor have any faith in your fellow American."

Less all the time, actually.

"It is for the use in throwing off the chains of a tyrannical government."

And the horse-drawn buggy was for use in personal transportation.

93 posted on 05/23/2009 8:41:00 PM PDT by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson