[chimera]

No circles for me. I’m interested in beating ‘Rats, in particular Strickland and Obombah. If that means we get 90% of what we want, that sounds like a better tactical position than 0% with Strickland/Obombah. Only a fool would forego a 90% advantage in favor of 0%.

[Kent C]

No circles for me. I’m interested in beating ‘Rats, in particular Strickland and Obombah. If that means we get 90% of what we want, that sounds like a better tactical position than 0% with Strickland/Obombah. Only a fool would forego a 90% advantage in favor of 0%.

Well, what is it then? You said:

"As long as it doesn't include abortion."

IOW, you could have a candidate that was 90% except for abortion and you wouldn't vote for them. That makes you a 'fool' by your own stated standard above.