Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham

Thanks for that Uncle Sam. My question is tho WHY will the Supreme Court not hear the cases already before them? Why have they chosen this when it is of the utmost importance? It is their ONLY mission to uphold the Constitution of the United States and they swear to do that before being seated on the Court.

I think your idea of peppering the Congress and Senate with this is good but everyone has dismissed it so far. I fear that a lot of folks don’t care if he’s an illegal alien President. The American public had such a suppository of hate up their A$$es against Pres. Bush that they were completely blinded. They wanted change, they got change but Terrible terrible change. The country will be changed alright but into something unrecognizable. CO


89 posted on 05/30/2009 9:55:21 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Outrage
"My question is tho WHY will the Supreme Court not hear the cases already before them?"

I think one reason is that the cases themselves were improperly constructed from a variety of angles, standing, case, etc. When I say "improper" I mean that the cases and plaintiffs involved, because of the case angle and who filed it, made it legally easy for judges to side step the issue.

I think the "standing" issue has been solved with using the Oath of office to "support" the Constitution requirement from the language of the Constitution itself. Anyone who is bound by this oath is thus REQUIRED by the Constitution to "support" the Constitution. Section three of the Twentieth amendment is currently being ignored, or non-enforced, or possibly complied with but we have no evidence to confirm this. If it has been complied with, we the people have a right to know this, who complied?, where is the compliance documentation?, etc. If it has not been complied with, our elected officials are REQUIRED to ensure that the Constitution be obeyed and ENFORCED. I don't see how a judge can deny this case. To do so would be asking someone who is Constitutionally required to enforce the Constitution to ignore parts of it. It is not a pick and choose document.

In the end, it might take all of us filing legal charges against those who pretend to represent our interest but instead are undermining our children's future.

92 posted on 05/30/2009 10:26:20 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson