Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham
"Section 4 - Republican government -- The United States shall GUARANTEE to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence." (Emphases Mine)

Believe it or not, I took your advice and Article Four, Section Four, jumped out at me!

... And I did a little research, as follows:

Republic (n)

1: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and is usually a president; also: a nation or other political unit having such a government

2: a government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to VOTE and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to LAW; also: a nation or other political unit having such a form of government(Emphases Mine)

Notice #2: The SUPREME POWER of 'The Citizens' is transfered by the agency of the citizens VOTE to Officers and REPRESENTATIVES who then become empowered to govern -- on behalf of the citizens -- according to LAW.

Now once we EMPOWER the aforementioned REPRESENTATIVES to govern on our behalf, through the agency of our VOTE; the most obvious way to dis-empower them, is ALSO, though the agency of our vote.

I also found this little "gem" as follows:

GUARANTEE OF REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT

The first clause of this section, in somewhat different language, was contained in the Virginia Plan introduced in the Convention and was obviously attributable to Madison. 321 Through the various permutations into its final form, 322 the object of the clause seems clearly to have been more than an authorization for the Federal Government to protect States against foreign invasion or internal insurrection, 323 a power seemingly already conferred in any case. 324 No one can now resurrect the full meaning of the clause and intent which moved the Framers to adopt it, but with the exception of the reliance for a brief period during Reconstruction the authority contained within the confines of the clause has been largely unexplored. 325

In Luther v. Borden, 326 the Supreme Court established the doctrine that questions arising under this section are political, not judicial, in character and that "it rests with Congress to decide what government is the established one in a State . . . as well as its republican character..."

So -- according to the Supreme Court -- CONGRESS must GUARANTEE: A Republican form of Government.

The KEY word here is GUARANTEE.

So my question is this:

What LAWS have Congress passed in order to "guarantee" a Republican Form of Government?

Who will oversee this "GUARANTEE" if the Supreme Court won't!

THE AMERICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT (copy and past)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fingodwetrustblog%2Ecom%2F2009%2F03%2F28%2Fa%2Dconstitutional%2Drepublic%2Dor%2Da%2Ddemocracy%2F&feature=player_embedded

Excerpt:

When Ben Franklin exited the constitutional convention he was asked by a woman:

'Sir, what have you given us?'

He replied 'A Republic Ma am, if you can keep it'

Apparently, the burden is on "We the People" to restore the republic, before it's too late!

We must keep the issue of Obama's hiding his citizenship status -- in plain sight of The United States Congress -- alive!

STE=Q

25 posted on 05/23/2009 7:45:48 PM PDT by STE=Q
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q
"Now once we EMPOWER the aforementioned REPRESENTATIVES to govern on our behalf, through the agency of our VOTE; the most obvious way to dis-empower them, is ALSO, though the agency of our vote."

Our "vote" cannot be the only way because if they want to ignore the Constitution, whats to keep them from simply ignoring the parts of it that require elections? We MUST and investigate and define all avenues of removal of our "public servants". Good digging, though.

26 posted on 05/23/2009 8:16:47 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: STE=Q
“We must keep the issue of Obama’s hiding his citizenship status — in plain sight of The United States Congress — alive!”

Well said! Until he provides access to all documents (BC, Passports, etc.) he should be forced to admit the truth, that he is hiding them from the people.

95 posted on 06/01/2009 8:57:57 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson